© 2016 T. A. Sidorova, L.B. Sandakova, Е. Y. Zhichina
2016 – №1 (11)
Abstract: The article provides philosophical and methodological analysis of the sources of transformation of procreation norms and values. The analysis is based on a phenomenological study of women’s participation in IVF programs. Procreation is considered as a process of human reproduction in culture. The norms fix the value-semantic content of procreation. Procreation eliminates moral norms when terminal values are replaced by instrumental values. As a result, the creational meaning of human reproduction is destroyed. Phenomenology of experiences of women in IVF clinics is presented in three stages: diagnosis of infertility, IVF and reproductive decision-making. The article illustrates the process of complication of responsibilities for women which happens alongside her moral self-identification. As the result, the change in cultural norms of procreation happens under repressive influence of instrumental and technological approach to reproduction.
Keywords: procreation, reproduction, assisted reproductive technologies, norms, values, moral values, bioethics.
References
Tkach, O. (2013) Napolovinu rodnye? Problematizatsiia rodstva i sem’i v gazetnykh publikatsiiakh o vspomogatel’nykh reproduktivnykh tekhnologiiakh [Half native? Problematization of kinship and family in newspaper publications on assisted reproductive technologies], Zhurnal issledovanii sotsial’noi politiki [Journal of Social Policy Research], Vol. 11, No. 1, p. 49–68.
Isupova, O.G. (2011) Modernizatsiia zhenskikh motivatsii k rozhdeniiu detei: dekonstruktsiia materinstva [Modernization of women’s motivations for the birth of children: deconstruction of motherhood]
(http://demoscope.ru/weekly/2011/0453/analit03.php) (Date of access: 25.05.2015)
Isupova, O.G. (2011a) Pravo khotet’ slishkom sil’no: biotekhnologii i reproduktivnye zhelaniia [The right to want too much: biotechnology and reproductive desires] (http://demoscope.ru/weekly/2011/0453/analit02.php) (Date of access: 25.05.2015)
Blokh, M.E. (2011) Vynosit’ i rodit’ rebenka dlia chuzhoi supruzheskoi pary [To bear and give birth to a child for someone else’s married couple], Perinatal’naia psikhologiia i psikhologiia reproduktivnoi sfery [Perinatal psychology and psychology of the reproductive sphere], Vol. 1–2 (2), p. 95–107.
Blokh, M.E. (2010) Vliianie motivatsii patsientok k ispol’zovaniiu vspomogatel’nykh reproduktivnykh tekhnologii na rezul’tativnost’ etikh metodov [Influence of motivation of patients to use assisted reproductive technologies on the effectiveness of these methods], Rozhdenie i zhizn’. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii po klinicheskoi psikhologii detstva [Birth and life. Proceedings of the International Conference on Clinical Psychology of Childhood], SPb.: SPbGPMA, p. 239–242.
Beliaeva, M.A. (2014) Transliatsiia reproduktivnoi kul’tury v sovremennom rossiiskom obshchestve [Translation of reproductive culture in modern Russian society], Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii [Pedagogical Education in Russia], Vol. 4.
Reut, D.V. (2006) Prokreatsionnaia kontseptsiia zdravookhraneniia. Rossiia: tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiia [Procreational concept of health. Russia: Trends and Development Prospects]. Vyp. 2. M.: INION RAN.
Val’denfel’s, B. (2011) Motiv chuzhogo [Motive of a stranger], Minsk: Propilei.
Sidorova, T.A. (2014) Normativnyi status bioetiki [Normative status of bioethics], Vestnik NGU [Bulletin of Novosibirsk State University], Vol. 4, p. 69–75.
Bratus’, B.S. (1997) K probleme cheloveka v psikhologii [To the problem of man in psychology], Voprosy psikhologii [Questions of Psychology], Vol. 5, p. 3–19.
Brutman, V.I., Radionova, M.S. (1997) Formirovanie priviazannosti materi k rebenku v period beremennosti [The shaping of mother-to-child attachment during pregnancy], Voprosy psikhologii [Questions of Psychology], Vol. 6.
Rukovodstvo VOZ dlia laboratornogo issledovaniia i obrabotki chelovecheskoi spermy [WHO guidelines for laboratory testing and treatment of human sperm] (2010)
Duster T. (2004) Eugenics, Encyclopedia of Bioethics, 3rd ed. Edited by Stepen G.Post, V.1, p. 855.
Brutman, V.I., Radionova, M.S. (1997) Formirovanie priviazannosti materi k rebenku v period beremennosti [Formation of mother-to-child attachment during pregnancy], Voprosy psikhologii [Questions of Psychology], Vol. 6.
Voik, O.V. (2011) Psikhologicheskaia pozitsiia akushera-ginekologa v professional’noi deiatel’nosti. Opredelenie vedushchikh zashchitnykh mekhanizmov lichnosti vracha, osnovnykh konfliktov i napriazheniia vlechenii [Psychological position of obstetrician-gynecologist in professional activity. Defining the leading protective mechanisms of the physician’s personality, the main conflicts and the tension of drives], Perinatal’naia psikhologiia i psikhologiia reproduktivnoi sfery [Perinatal psychology and psychology of the reproductive sphere], Vol. 1–2(2).
Sedova, N.N., Sergeeva, N.V. (2010) Bioetika v prostranstve kul’tury [Bioethics in the space of culture], M.: Triumf.