© 2021 Bahmatova M.N.
2021 – № 1 (21)
Citation link:
Bahmatova M.N. (2021) Reprodukcija v kontekste mirovyh religij (interdisciplinarnaja nauchnaja konferencija) [Reproduction in the Context of World Religions (an Interdisciplinary Academic Conference)], Medicinskaja antropologija i biojetika [Medical Anthropology and Bioethics], 1 (21).
Author info:
Marina Bakhmatova, Cand. Hist. Sc., Ph. D., is an Associate Professor at the Ethnology Department of the Historical Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University.
Keywords: reproduction, assisted reproductive technology (ART), world religions, bioethics, medical anthropology, embryo, surrogacy, gamete, zygote, in vitro fertilisation (IVF), abortion, motherhood, fatherhood, Catholicism, Orthodox Christianity, Islam, Buddhism
Abstract. This article reviews the interdisciplinary academic conference Reproduction in the Context of World Religions: Anthropological and Bioethical Aspects, held on February 4, 2021, by the Center for Medical Anthropology, Mikluho-Maklai Institute. Summaries of the presentations are discussed, as well as the round-table Religious Institutions and the Problems of Choosing Reproductive Technologies. The forum touched upon a wide range of problems of reproductive practices and religious bioethics. Comparison of the positions of various religious systems showed that the attitudes to assisted reproduction within the world religions’ are most ambivalent. In Buddhism, Islam and Christianity, there are considerable variations in regards to surrogacy, the use of donor’s gametes, adoption, IVF, the embryo’s status, etc. Research of the nature of these problems seems most relevant today, in a multi-confessional country like Russia.
References
Agamben, G. (2020) La medicina come religione, Quodlibet, Una Voce di Giorgio Agamben, 2 maggio (https://www.quodlibet.it/giorgio-agamben-la-medicina-come-religione) (11.04.21).
Boer, Т., Dekker, C. (2013) I don’t want comfort. I want God, I want real Danger, Human Enhancement. Scientific Ethical and Theological Aspects from European Perspective, Church and Society Commission of CEC, p. 33–55.
Geertz, C. J. (2004) Interpretacija kul’tur [Interpretation of cultures], Moscow: ROSSPEN.
Habermas J. (2002) Budushhee chelovecheskoj prirody [The Future of Human Nature], Moscow: Ves’ Mir.
Human Enhancement: Scientific, Ethical and Theological Aspects from a European Perspective (2013) Church and Society Commission of the Conference of European Churches (https://www.ceceurope.org/human-enhancement-scientific-ethical-and-theological-aspects-from-a-european-perspective/) (11.05.2021).
Jutshi: pamjatnik srednevekovoj tibetskoj kul’tury [Jutshi: monument of medieval Tibetan culture] (1988) S. M. Nikolaev, R. E. Pubaev (eds), D.B.Dashiev (transl.), Novosibirsk: Nauka.
Mercer, C., Trothen, T. J. (eds.) (2014) Religion and Transhumanism: The Unknown Future of Human Enhancement, Santa Barbara, Denver, Oxford: Praeger.
O transplantacii organov i (ili) tkanej cheloveka [About transplantation of human organs and (or) tissues] (1992) Zakon Rossijskoj Federacii [The Law of the Russian Federation] (http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102020471) (17.05.2021).
Osnovy social’noj koncepcii RPC [Fundamentals of the social concept of the Russian Orthodox Church] (2008) Oficial’nyj sajt Moskovskogo Patriarhata [Official site of the Moscow Patriarchate] (http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/419128.html) (07.05.2021).
Pravoslavie i problemy biojetiki [Orthodoxy and problems of bioethics] (2017) Collection of works, Moscow: Patriarchal Commission on Family Issues, Protection of Motherhood and Childhood (https://pk-semya.ru/images/news/2015/pks_2017-r.pdf) (14.05.2021).
Zhabon, Yu. Zh., Rinchinova, O.S. (2018) Tibetskaja medicina: osobennosti biojeticheskih i jeticheskih predstavlenij [Tibetan medicine: features of bioethical and ethical views], Biojetika[Bioethics], Vol. 11, No 2, p. 6–9.